 |
|
 |
 |
|
The concept of Regional Resource Centre is grounded on a need-based partnership between the Government and non-Government sectors.
In 1997, the Department of Family Welfare (DoFW), Govt. of India (GoI), introduced the MNGO scheme under RCH programme. Under this scheme, DoFW, GoI identified and sanctioned grants to selected NGOs called Mother NGOs (MNGOs) in allocated districts for promotion of the goals/objectives of the RCH programme. These MNGOs, in turn, issued grants to smaller NGOs, called Field NGOs (FNGOs), in the allocated districts. Towards the end of RCH-I in the year 2002, GoI had identified four national NGOs as RRCs (during 10th Five Year Plan) to provide technical support to the MNGOs, so that they in turn provide support to respective FNGOs. Initially four RRCs were established: CINI (for Eastern and Northeastern states), VHAI (for North India), FPAI (for Western India) and Gandhigram Institute of Health and Family Welfare Trust (for South India). For facilitating coordination and information sharing between RRCs and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, GoI, an Apex Resource Cell (ARC) has been established within the NGO Division of Ministry of H &FW. ARC is responsible for capacity building of RRCs and in turn of the MNGOs, and monitor and reports their functioning to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, GoI,
In February 2002, CINI started its journey as Regional Resource Centre with the responsibility of four Eastern states (West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa) and eight Northeastern states including Sikkim. In all these states, CINI was primarily responsible for training of the MNGOs on NGO guidelines, RCH Service Delivery Components, Baseline Survey and Project Proposal Development as well as facilitating the GO-NGO partnership.
However, with the launch of NRHM in 2005 and a shift from macro level activities (i.e. focusing on national level issues) to micro level activities (i.e. more involvement of RRCs in to district/block level activities), it became difficult for one RRC to look after so many states. Therefore, considering the workload of RRCs, GoI established another six RRCs during April 2005 in order to ensure more comprehensive support to MNGOs and FNGOs.
According to new jurisdiction set by GoI, CINI-RRC continued to provide support to the states of WB, Orissa, Jharkhand and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. For the states of WB and Orissa, CINI-RRC completed the training of 37 MNGOs on NGO guidelines, Baseline Survey, Proposal Development and RCH technical issues. In April 2006, in order top provide a more intensive support, GoI approved a new RRC for the state of Orissa.
|
|
Capacity building of MNGOs (district based NGOs) to take the challenge of sustaining the GO-NGO partnership and provide services to the unreached for reaching the Health and Family Welfare goals set by the governments at the National and State level.
|
|
Capacity Building
|
|

|
Provide technical assistance for capacity building of
MNGOs/FNGOs/SNGOs under NGO scheme, Govt. of India
|

Publication of the Implementation Guide Book, Vol-II by
Commissioner, Dept.of H & FW, WB and Dy. Commissioner, NGO Div.,
GoI
|
|
Providing training support for project development, training in programme and technical areas, dissemination of relevant training and communication material
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGO Appraisal and Selection
|
|

|
Participate in selection and sanctioning of the MNGO/SNGO projects.
|
|

|
Coordinate with Best Practices Centres (BPCs), the specialized institution to provide technical resources in particular fields like Adolescent Health, Gender Issue etc
|
|
Support to State NGO committee
|
|

|
Facilitate networking and sharing of experiences and lessons learned between Govt. and NGO functionaries.
|
|

|
Conduct/participate in field visits and assist in review of periodic progress reports to assess effectiveness of technical support and training inputs
|
|

|
Providing a platform for advocacy to facilitate GO-NGO networking
|
|
Coordinating with GoI
|
|

|
Providing inputs to GoI to enable policy modification/formulation for NGO
programmes.
|
|
On the spot support to MNGOs/SNGOs/FNGOs and other stakeholders
|
|

|
On the spot support to MNGOs during FNGO trainings
|
|

|
Supportive supervision and field visit to MNGO-FNGO project areas
|
|
Documentation and dissemination of key learnings and innovative approaches
|
|

|
Act as clearing house for training and communication materials, function as knowledge dissemination centre for MNGOs
|
|

|
Document innovations, disseminate successful approaches and creative strategies in RCH service delivery.
|
|
New jurisdiction for the 11 RRCs from 1st April 2006 looks like:
|
|
|
 |
Child
In Need Institute (CINI)
West Bengal, Jharkhand,
and Andaman & Nicobar Islands Contact |
 |
Family
Planning Association of India (FPAI)
Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh
Contact
|
 |
Voluntary
Health Association of India (VHAI)
Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan,
Uttaranchal, Jammu and Kashmir
Contact |
 |
Gandhigram
Institute of Rural Health & Family Welfare Trust (GIRHFWT)
Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and
Lakshadeep
Contact |
 |
Centre
for Health, Education, Training and Nutrition Awareness
(CHETNA)
Gujarat, Daman & Diu, Dadar
& Nagar Haveli
Contact |
 |
Hindustan
Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust (HLFPPT)
Andhra Pradesh
Contact
|
 |
Mamta
Health Institute for Mother & Child (MAMTA)
Punjab, Haryana & Chandigarh
Contact |
 |
Population
Foundation of India (PFI)
Bihar & Chhattisgarh
Contact |
 |
State
Innovation in Family Planning Services Project Agency (SIFPSA)
Uttar Pradesh
Contact |
 |
Assam
Voluntary Health Association (VHAA)
Assam, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur,
Mizoram, Sikkim
Contact
|
 |
Swastha
Sikhya - The State Society for Health and Family Welfare
Education
Orissa
Contact
|
|
 |
Coming to the end
of RCH-I Programme many lessons have been learnt, that
needs much overhauling though flexible, cohesive and
strategic planning to effectively reach the national
long-term goals. Among them the most important is the
strategic mode of functioning of NGOs that was clearly
spelt out in the line of awareness generation. In RCH-II
a complete paradigm shift has been brought through
introducing the service delivery component in the MNGO
scheme. With the learnings from RCH-I a decentralized
approach is adopted in the management and implementation
of the MNGO scheme. This implies, starting from
identification of NGOs, recommending the proposals for
GoI approval, the State RCH Society takes the
responsibility. The MNGOs are members of the District
RCH Society. The role of Govt. of India is one of policy
guidance, approvals, and funding and technical support.
This is envisaged
by involving NGOs to work in areas that are un-served or
under-served areas which are socio-economically
backward, and do not have access to health care services
from the existing govt. health infrastructure.
|
 |
With the launch of National
Rural Health Mission [NRHM] (12th April 2005) the
entire country now seeks to provide effective health
care to the entire rural population in the country with
special focus on 18 states (including the EAG states)
that have weak public health indicators. As an umbrella
programme that integrates all vertical health and family
welfare programmes (including RCH) NRHM seeks for
optimal utilization of resources and strengthening
delivery mechanism. With decentralization right from the
district level down to the village level it seeks to
improve access of rural people, especially poor women
and children to equitable, affordable, accountable and
effective primary health care. Convergence of related
departments (including Panchayeti Raj Institutions) is
charted out as one of the key strategies of NRHM.
|
 |
Role of NGOs in
NRHM:
| 1. |
Included
in institutional arrangement at National, State
and District levels, including Standing
Mentoring Group for ASHA |
| 2. |
Member
of Task Groups |
| 3. |
Provision
of Training, BCC and Technical Support for ASHAs/
DHM |
| 4. |
Health
Resource Organizations |
| 5. |
Service
delivery for identified population groups on
select themes |
| 6. |
For
monitoring, evaluation and social audit |
|
 |
In RCH-II
according to guidelines provided by Government of India,
each MNGO was be allotted only one (at most two)
district to work with. Jurisdiction of FNGOs was
limited to the service area of the selected unserved or
underserved sub-centre areas resided by the concerned
districts.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|